Amy Blackstone
Autore di Childfree by Choice: The Movement Redefining Family and Creating a New Age of Independence
Sull'Autore
Fonte dell'immagine: Amy Blackstone
Opere di Amy Blackstone
Etichette
Informazioni generali
- Nome canonico
- Blackstone, Amy
- Data di nascita
- 20th Century
- Sesso
- female
- Nazionalità
- USA
- Istruzione
- Luther College (BA)
University of Minnesota (PhD) - Attività lavorative
- professor
Utenti
Recensioni
Childfree by Choice: The Movement Redefining Family… di Dr. Amy Blackstone
very much enjoyed this book! Dr. Amy Blackstone nicely blended this book with academic research with her own personal narrative and i think i liked it more since she added her own personal touch to it. this book is thoughtful in the way that i don't think Dr. Blackstone is preaching anything; she is simply presenting the information and data she's collected in a coherent way. there are SO many reasons people choose not have children and this book does a good job talking about a lot of them
It's always a little bit harder for me to discuss non-fiction books I've listened to on audio; My audio comprehension is still not a match to my reading comprehension and I'm not quite as able to recall the details as well.
Even so, this book was eye opening for me. MT and I are child free by choice, and I've definitely experienced the bog-standard lines: you'll change your mind and it's different when it's yours and it's not too late, as well as the arguments for more exciting holidays and built-in old-age care. (All of which are fallacies: I almost never change my mind about anything, I'd feel no different if 'it' was my own, and at 49, which is the last time the 'not too late' argument was used, it's categorically too late, if not medically, then rationally. And while I'm willing to concede that some holidays might be more fun, there's no guarantee that anyone's children won't stick them in an old-age home when the time comes. Harsh, but true.)
But I've never experienced the vitriolic rhetoric aimed at us as a group; an upside to having always avoided the Editorial/Opinion section of the news, I guess. Wow. People need to worry less about what everyone else is doing and look inward; if these pundits have time to turn themselves inside out about other people's life choices, they have too much free time on their hands and not enough perspective on actual, real world issues.
As I was listening to this book and thinking "how have I missed all this nonsense, and who do I thank for that?" it started to niggle at me that, actually, I might have been on the receiving end of some of the blowback to choosing child free, I've just never acknowledged it as such. Not from a professional standpoint; frankly, I think my bosses were all too happy I'd not be taking maternity leave to be fussed about my rebellion against my (apparent) civic duty. But personally, socially ... that becomes trickier. Have I lost friends after they had kids? Certainly. MT and I used to have a much more jam-packed social calendar, until friends started spawning and we lost touch with more and more of them. But I can't say with any certainty that it's because we chose not to have kids; the toll newborns take on couples, then the non-stop demands of toddlers, could explain a lot of it. The medical issues that have necessarily slowed both MT and I down certainly are to blame for some of it too. But I can't be sure our choice not to have kids isn't at play either. Both my best friends have kids, and I never lost touch with either of them - in fact I was a huge part of first 10 years of one of the kids' lives, until I moved down under.
Anyway, the takeaway here is that the book has left me with things to chew on, and it certainly opened my eyes to societal reactions to those who choose to not procreate. So in that sense, the book was an outstanding success. It was, however, a dry read; very much structured like a dissertation that's been fleshed out for publication. I think the narrator of the audio helps overcome that a little, though it's still by no means a riveting read. MT overheard it when I was listening while gardening, and he though I was listening to the news.
I was also constantly jarred by her use of fertility; no question she's using it exactly the way it should be used, but to me fertility has always meant the ability to procreate, while in this book she uses it to refer to actual birthing of children, ie the fertility rates dropped during the global economic crisis to her means people stopped having children during the GFC. I kept thinking 'what does the GFC have to do with ability to conceive?'. That's my shortcoming though, not the author's.
All in all it was a very worthwhile read for me. Depending on one's level of engagement in this issue, individual results may vary. I will end this with saying it's a good book for anyone - with children or without - interested in the values and reactions society places on people when it comes to planning the future of their families.… (altro)
Even so, this book was eye opening for me. MT and I are child free by choice, and I've definitely experienced the bog-standard lines: you'll change your mind and it's different when it's yours and it's not too late, as well as the arguments for more exciting holidays and built-in old-age care. (All of which are fallacies: I almost never change my mind about anything, I'd feel no different if 'it' was my own, and at 49, which is the last time the 'not too late' argument was used, it's categorically too late, if not medically, then rationally. And while I'm willing to concede that some holidays might be more fun, there's no guarantee that anyone's children won't stick them in an old-age home when the time comes. Harsh, but true.)
But I've never experienced the vitriolic rhetoric aimed at us as a group; an upside to having always avoided the Editorial/Opinion section of the news, I guess. Wow. People need to worry less about what everyone else is doing and look inward; if these pundits have time to turn themselves inside out about other people's life choices, they have too much free time on their hands and not enough perspective on actual, real world issues.
As I was listening to this book and thinking "how have I missed all this nonsense, and who do I thank for that?" it started to niggle at me that, actually, I might have been on the receiving end of some of the blowback to choosing child free, I've just never acknowledged it as such. Not from a professional standpoint; frankly, I think my bosses were all too happy I'd not be taking maternity leave to be fussed about my rebellion against my (apparent) civic duty. But personally, socially ... that becomes trickier. Have I lost friends after they had kids? Certainly. MT and I used to have a much more jam-packed social calendar, until friends started spawning and we lost touch with more and more of them. But I can't say with any certainty that it's because we chose not to have kids; the toll newborns take on couples, then the non-stop demands of toddlers, could explain a lot of it. The medical issues that have necessarily slowed both MT and I down certainly are to blame for some of it too. But I can't be sure our choice not to have kids isn't at play either. Both my best friends have kids, and I never lost touch with either of them - in fact I was a huge part of first 10 years of one of the kids' lives, until I moved down under.
Anyway, the takeaway here is that the book has left me with things to chew on, and it certainly opened my eyes to societal reactions to those who choose to not procreate. So in that sense, the book was an outstanding success. It was, however, a dry read; very much structured like a dissertation that's been fleshed out for publication. I think the narrator of the audio helps overcome that a little, though it's still by no means a riveting read. MT overheard it when I was listening while gardening, and he though I was listening to the news.
I was also constantly jarred by her use of fertility; no question she's using it exactly the way it should be used, but to me fertility has always meant the ability to procreate, while in this book she uses it to refer to actual birthing of children, ie the fertility rates dropped during the global economic crisis to her means people stopped having children during the GFC. I kept thinking 'what does the GFC have to do with ability to conceive?'. That's my shortcoming though, not the author's.
All in all it was a very worthwhile read for me. Depending on one's level of engagement in this issue, individual results may vary. I will end this with saying it's a good book for anyone - with children or without - interested in the values and reactions society places on people when it comes to planning the future of their families.… (altro)
Excellent Premise. Good yet flawed effort. As an introduction to the childfree movement and its history, this book serves as a solid primer for anyone who does not know either or both of these topics. As someone who is childfree and is active in various levels of working within the childfree community, I had *very* high hopes for this book. Unfortunately this book just had too many flaws to rate it any higher than the three stars I decided to give it. For one, it makes scientific claims using only sociological evidence. Which is perhaps allowed in the author's own background in the humanities and specifically sociology, but this reader is a trained scientist with a math and computer background. The book also tries to back up many of its claims with studies that often have only a couple of dozen participants or less - again, perhaps a valid tactic in sociological research circles, but in the statistical analysis world more familiar to this reader would be laughed out of even a bachelor's level statistics class. Also, while the book is titled referring to the entire childfree movement, its arguments and discussions are almost entirely from the female perspective, and even when the male perspective is included it is more often denigrated as too small to study or present. Finally, all of these combine to leave the severe impression of a major case of confirmation bias on the part of the author - even from someone predisposed to trying to see this book in the best possible light and wanting it to succeed in order to help bring light to an aspect of his own life.
Overall a solid yet flawed effort, and highly recommended despite the flaws - the conversation it presents is truly that critical, and the book does a genuinely adequate job of at least opening that conversation.… (altro)
Overall a solid yet flawed effort, and highly recommended despite the flaws - the conversation it presents is truly that critical, and the book does a genuinely adequate job of at least opening that conversation.… (altro)
As someone who is not getting married and not having kids, I get a lot of pushback. So I usually enjoy reading this kind of book. However, Childfree by Choice just rubbed me the wrong way.
First, I think it had a lot of potential, and at first I was excited to finally read a book where an author writes "heterosexual couples" rather than just "couples" as if gay people don't exist or matter somehow, but then the author basically just talked about straight married or straight coupled people for the entire book. As somebody who identifies with more than one of the letters in LGBTQIA+, I was disappointed that the trans experience was one or two sentences, intersex ignored, asexuals ignored, and bisexual people just passably mentioned. Gay folks and lesbians at least got a couple of mentions here and there.
But seriously, a lot of the issues brought up in this book really lock in to the idea of a gender binary. Maybe if we could stop being so uptight about what "woman" means (or be so bought in to the idea that it matters that there is such a thing as a "woman"), things could start getting better. Like IDGAF if not having kids makes me not "feminine." I reject the very idea. Why spend paragraphs talking about how women without kids really are feminine rather than just admitting that the entire idea is an absurdity?
Second, I joke with people that I'm not getting married so at least people will keep asking me the invasive question of when I'm going to get married rather than the even more invasive question about when I'm going to have kids. But like, this book was all about the coupled peoples experience. Let me tell you, being single and childfree sometimes makes life harder, especially living in a suburb. Again, I guess this just struck me as a shame, because the book could have been so much more interesting and progressive if the focus hadn't been on so many straight couples. Let's join up and smash the status quo together! But no, I'll just live somewhere in the margins instead I guess.
Last, something just I couldn't put my finger on just really rubbed me the wrong way while I was reading this book. I think it took almost to the end of the book when it dawned on me. I don't give a crap what studies say about happiness / life satisfaction / life expectancy / financial status / etc. in parents / non-parents... I've made a decision not to have children, and it's nobody's business but my own. Everybody needs to respect that. It doesn't matter if I've made what could objectively be pointed to as the correct or incorrect decision based on empirical data. I've made the correct decision *for me*, and no number of studies makes that an invalid choice. Same goes for parents. They've made the correct decision *for them*, and it doesn't matter what the studies say. So spending an entire book quoting studies to help people rationalize not having children isn't really the kind of pushback I'd like against a society that stigmatizes my life and my decisions.
I mean yes, women basically lose no matter what. They don't have enough kids, they have too many kids, they have the wrong kind of kids. And that needs to stop. But social scientists studying perceived levels of happiness isn't the way to get where we need to go. Unfortunately this book does not bring us any closer to that place either, other than raising awareness on an issue that doesn't really need awareness, but good sound public policy (and invasive humans minding their own business and not asking people when they're going to have kids).… (altro)
First, I think it had a lot of potential, and at first I was excited to finally read a book where an author writes "heterosexual couples" rather than just "couples" as if gay people don't exist or matter somehow, but then the author basically just talked about straight married or straight coupled people for the entire book. As somebody who identifies with more than one of the letters in LGBTQIA+, I was disappointed that the trans experience was one or two sentences, intersex ignored, asexuals ignored, and bisexual people just passably mentioned. Gay folks and lesbians at least got a couple of mentions here and there.
But seriously, a lot of the issues brought up in this book really lock in to the idea of a gender binary. Maybe if we could stop being so uptight about what "woman" means (or be so bought in to the idea that it matters that there is such a thing as a "woman"), things could start getting better. Like IDGAF if not having kids makes me not "feminine." I reject the very idea. Why spend paragraphs talking about how women without kids really are feminine rather than just admitting that the entire idea is an absurdity?
Second, I joke with people that I'm not getting married so at least people will keep asking me the invasive question of when I'm going to get married rather than the even more invasive question about when I'm going to have kids. But like, this book was all about the coupled peoples experience. Let me tell you, being single and childfree sometimes makes life harder, especially living in a suburb. Again, I guess this just struck me as a shame, because the book could have been so much more interesting and progressive if the focus hadn't been on so many straight couples. Let's join up and smash the status quo together! But no, I'll just live somewhere in the margins instead I guess.
Last, something just I couldn't put my finger on just really rubbed me the wrong way while I was reading this book. I think it took almost to the end of the book when it dawned on me. I don't give a crap what studies say about happiness / life satisfaction / life expectancy / financial status / etc. in parents / non-parents... I've made a decision not to have children, and it's nobody's business but my own. Everybody needs to respect that. It doesn't matter if I've made what could objectively be pointed to as the correct or incorrect decision based on empirical data. I've made the correct decision *for me*, and no number of studies makes that an invalid choice. Same goes for parents. They've made the correct decision *for them*, and it doesn't matter what the studies say. So spending an entire book quoting studies to help people rationalize not having children isn't really the kind of pushback I'd like against a society that stigmatizes my life and my decisions.
I mean yes, women basically lose no matter what. They don't have enough kids, they have too many kids, they have the wrong kind of kids. And that needs to stop. But social scientists studying perceived levels of happiness isn't the way to get where we need to go. Unfortunately this book does not bring us any closer to that place either, other than raising awareness on an issue that doesn't really need awareness, but good sound public policy (and invasive humans minding their own business and not asking people when they're going to have kids).… (altro)
Liste
Statistiche
- Opere
- 1
- Utenti
- 56
- Popolarità
- #291,557
- Voto
- 3.6
- Recensioni
- 5
- ISBN
- 4