Michael F. Bird
Autore di Evangelical Theology: A Biblical and Systematic Introduction
Sull'Autore
Michael F. Bird is academic dean and lecturer in theology at Ridley College in Melbourne, Australia. He's is the author of more than a dozen books including What Christians Ought to Believe and Evangelical Theology. He also runs a popular theological studies blog called "Euangelion" and can be mostra altro followed on twitter @mbird12. mostra meno
Fonte dell'immagine: Faculty profile picture (Ridley College)
Serie
Opere di Michael F. Bird
How God Became Jesus: The Real Origins of Belief in Jesus' Divine Nature---A Response to Bart D. Ehrman (2014) 206 copie
What Christians Ought to Believe: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine Through the Apostles’ Creed (2016) 150 copie
The Faith of Jesus Christ: Exegetical, Biblical, and Theological Studies (2009) — A cura di; Introduzione — 108 copie
The Saving Righteousness of God: Studies on Paul, Justification and the New Perspective (2007) 88 copie
Bourgeois Babes, Bossy Wives, and Bobby Haircuts: A Case for Gender Equality in Ministry (Fresh Perspectives on Women… (2012) 66 copie
Religious Freedom in a Secular Age: A Christian Case for Liberty, Equality, and Secular Government (2022) 53 copie
The New Testament You Never Knew Study Guide: Exploring the Context, Purpose, and Meaning of the Story of God (2019) — Autore — 40 copie
Paul and the Gospels: Christologies, Conflicts and Convergences (The Library of New Testament Studies) (2011) 11 copie
The New Testament You Never Knew Video Study: Exploring the Context, Purpose, and Meaning of the Story of God (2019) — Autore — 9 copie
The New Testament You Never Knew Study Guide with DVD: Exploring the Context, Purpose, and Meaning of the Story of God (2019) — Autore — 8 copie
The Sacred Text: Excavating the Texts, Exploring the Interpretations, and Engaging the Theologies of the Christian… (2010) — A cura di — 2 copie
Four Views on the Apostle Paul, A Video Study: 18 Lessons on Reformed, Catholic, 'Post-New Perspective,' and Jewish… (2019) 1 copia
Josephus and the New Testament 1 copia
Opere correlate
The World of the New Testament: Cultural, Social, and Historical Contexts (2013) — Collaboratore — 163 copie
Jesus Is Lord, Caesar Is Not: Evaluating Empire in New Testament Studies (2012) — Collaboratore — 75 copie
Cosmology and New Testament Theology (Library of New Testament Studies) (2008) — Collaboratore — 20 copie
This World and the World to Come: Soteriology in Early Judaism (Library of Second Temple Studies) (2011) — Collaboratore — 12 copie
Etichette
Informazioni generali
- Data di nascita
- 1974
- Sesso
- male
- Nazionalità
- Australia
- Organizzazioni
- Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas
Utenti
Recensioni
Liste
Premi e riconoscimenti
Potrebbero anche piacerti
Autori correlati
Statistiche
- Opere
- 43
- Opere correlate
- 7
- Utenti
- 2,403
- Popolarità
- #10,675
- Voto
- 4.0
- Recensioni
- 17
- ISBN
- 101
- Lingue
- 1
- Preferito da
- 1
Of course, the selection of the N views is key to the quality of the book, and here editor Michael F. Bird has done a fine job. Resisting the temptation to include a broad array of perspectives and thus produce either a shallow survey or an unmanageable tome, his choice of four views allowed a substantive presentation of each perspective, plus responses, in 300 pages. Thomas R. Schreiner and Luke Timothy Johnson represent the Reformed Protestant and Roman Catholic views that characterize the basic Reformation-shaped discussions of Paul in Western Christianity. Douglas Campbell presents a view that has been developed in light of the New Perspective on Paul, as well as other Protestant influences. The surprising inclusion of Mark D. Nanos for a Jewish perspective of the "apostle to the Gentiles" fruitfully deepens the discussion of the Jewishness of Paul that has been raised by the New Perspective.
This selection of views is excellent, and bringing a Jewish voice to the table is important from a diversity standpoint: honestly, it's embarrassing to hear only Christians talking about whether and how Paul was a Jew. It is only unfortunate that Bird did not identify a woman scholar to represent one or more of the views, so that we did not hear only men talking about Paul's views on women. Such a scholar would likely have critiqued Campbell's exclusive use of "brothers" as language that adequately depicts Christians.
Bird structures the conversation by asking the authors to identify the theological framework that should be used to understand Paul, and to describe Paul's view of salvation, of the significance of Christ, and his vision for the churches. As he states in his introduction, these questions were selected in order to focus the discussion on areas in which there is significant disgreement. He also introduces the background of each contributor; in the conclusion, he helpfully summarizes the points of agreement and disagreement.
Although Johnson begins his essay with demurrals about how specifically Roman Catholic his position may be, it is clear to me that he and I operate out of the same tradition. His methodology and premises were at once familiar and persuasive to me, especially in comparison to Schreiner. Johnson's basic approach of identifying a few themes or concepts with broad attestation across many letters strikes me as more reliable than Schreiner's approach of constructing a systematic narrative that cites a verse or two as support for each statement and relies heavily on Romans and Galatians. Campbell takes an even narrower approach, concentrating on Romans 5-8 in order to identify and develop a single coherent theme; however, his discussion of freedom in the context of the communal, networked, social anthropology he sees in Paul was helpful and persuasive.
I read Nanos' chapter together with a Jewish friend with whom I've studied informally for several years on topics of Judaism, Christianity, and Jewish-Christian dialogue. She was very pleased by Nanos' ability to articulate several attitudes and concepts that she has struggled to express in our studies, and I found it edifying to understand how Paul has traditionally been perceived by the Jewish community. We both appreciated the careful verbal distinctions in this chapter between Jesus-believing Jews, non-Jesus-believing Jews, and Jesus-believing Gentiles: the language is cumbersome, but helpful in avoiding the unconscious translation of 1st-century terms to 21st-century categories.
Overall, this is a very good book, particularly well suited to ecumenical study and to the preparation of those who will minister and preach against an ecumenical background. (That would include pretty much all ministers in the Western church today.) It does require some basic familiarity with theological terms and Paul's letters, but does not require previous expertise in Pauline studies.
Dr. Bird kindly arranged for me to receive an advance copy of this book for use in my independent study course on Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant perspectives on Paul in the summer of 2012. It was extremely helpful for this work.… (altro)